Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-4765T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600 is 2844 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-4765T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4765T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 15% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i7-4765T - 175 vs 152 FPS
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i7-4765T - $102.37 vs $364.82
- Up to 76% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i7-4765T - $0.65 vs $2.66 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4765T - 12 vs 8 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €404.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8295 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
175
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.65/FPS
100%
Price, €
€113.63
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €113.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8294 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4765T | vs | Intel Core i5-11600 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |