Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4765T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4765T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 1530 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4765T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4765T
- Up to 13% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $364.82 vs $421.03
- Up to 10% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $3.27 vs $3.65 per FPS
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 3% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i7-4765T - 128 vs 124 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4765T - 32 vs 8 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
124
96%
Value, €/FPS
€3.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€404.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €404.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
128
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.65/FPS
89%
Price, €
€467.34
86%
FPS Winner
Buy for €467.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4765T | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |