Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms the more expensive Core i7-4765T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 9 3900X is 2226 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-4765T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4765T
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900X - 35 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
- Performs up to 4% better in Dead Space than Core i7-4765T - 154 vs 148 FPS
- Up to 21% cheaper than Core i7-4765T - $288.82 vs $364.82
- Up to 24% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i7-4765T - $2.08 vs $2.74 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4765T - 24 vs 8 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €404.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18025 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
154
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.08/FPS
100%
Price, €
€320.59
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €320.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18024 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4765T | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900X |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Haswell | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |