Buy on Amazon
€404.95
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $303
Availability
MSRP in USD: $303
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4765T outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4765T is 599 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4765T
- Performs up to 5% better in Elden Ring than FX-8150 - 116 vs 110 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i7-4765T - $59.97 vs $364.82
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Intel Core i7 i7-4765T Quad-core (4 Core) 2 GHz Processor - Socket H3 LGA-1150OEM Pack - 1 MB - 8 MB Cache - Yes - 3 GHz Overclocking Speed - 22 nm - 3 Number of Monitors Supported - Intel HD 4600 Gr
Buy for €404.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 152 minutes ago
AMD FX-Series FX-8150 FX8150 Desktop CPU Socket AM3 938 FD8150FRW8KGU FD8150FRGUBOX 8MB
Buy for €66.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 148 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i7-4765T
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FX-8150
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4765T | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| Core i7 | Collection | FX |
| Haswell | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.