Buy on Amazon
€170.43
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $383
Availability
MSRP in USD: $383
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms Core i7-4700MQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 2530 days newer than Core i7-4700MQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4700MQ
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700F - 47 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 8% better in Borderlands 3 than Core i7-4700MQ - 224 vs 208 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4700MQ - 16 vs 8 threads
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Core i7-10700F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
224
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.76/FPS
100%
Price, €
€170.43
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel® Core™ i7-10700F Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 4.8 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA1200 (Intel® 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for €170.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Core i7-4700MQ
Mobile • May 27th, 2013
Core i7-10700F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4700MQ | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
|---|---|---|
| May 27th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
47 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.