Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Core i7-4610M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 1705 days newer than Core i7-4610M.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4610M
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 37 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 5% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-4610M - 105 vs 100 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4610M - 24 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €608.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 67323 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Feb 1st, 2014
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Mobile • Feb 1st, 2014
Single-Core
1043
81.86813186813187%
Multi-Core
1957
26.254360075127448%
Intel Core i7-4610M | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Feb 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
37 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |