Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms Core i7-4600U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 2060 days newer than Core i7-4600U.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4600U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700F - 15 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 9% better in No Man's Sky than Core i7-4600U - 178 vs 164 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4600U - 8 vs 4 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
178
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€226.44
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €226.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 156 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4600U | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 5000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |