Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4500U outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4500U is 183 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4500U
- Performs up to 2% better in Valheim than Celeron G1620 - 193 vs 189 FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 15 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i7-4500U
Mobile • Jun 4th, 2013
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
53.116883116883116%
Multi-Core
723
49.72489683631362%
Intel Core i7-4500U | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 4th, 2013 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
15 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
