Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14600K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3960X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3960X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14600K is 4355 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3960X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3960X
- Up to 54% cheaper than Core i5-14600K - $211.47 vs $457.71
- Up to 38% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-14600K - $1.5 vs $2.42 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14600K
- Performs up to 34% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-3960X - 210 vs 157 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3960X - 20 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
FPS
157
74%
Value, €/FPS
€1.5/FPS
100%
Price, €
€234.73
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €234.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 120 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
210
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.42/FPS
61%
Price, €
€508.06
46%
FPS Winner
Buy for €508.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 119 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3960X | vs | Intel Core i5-14600K |
---|---|---|
Nov 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 14 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
130 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |