Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3960X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 2117 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3960X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3960X
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 130 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 2% better in Dead Space than Core i7-3960X - 149 vs 146 FPS
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i7-3960X - $80.42 vs $211.46
- Up to 63% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i7-3960X - $0.6 vs $1.61 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3960X - 16 vs 12 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €234.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 46 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
149
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.6/FPS
100%
Price, €
€89.27
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €89.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 47 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3960X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Nov 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |