Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3960X outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-3960X is 344 days older than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3960X
- Performs up to 2% better in Elden Ring than FX-6300 - 113 vs 111 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 12 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i7-3960X - $42.42 vs $255.92
- Up to 83% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i7-3960X - $0.42 vs $2.51 per FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Core i7-3960X - 95 vs 130 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
FPS
113
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.51/FPS
16%
Price, €
€284.07
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for €284.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 177 minutes ago
Buy for €47.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 178 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3960X | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Nov 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |