Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Athlon 3000G outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3960X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Athlon 3000G is 2928 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3960X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3960X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 3% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-3960X - 116 vs 113 FPS
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i7-3960X - $38.36 vs $255.92
- Up to 85% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i7-3960X - $0.37 vs $2.51 per FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Core i7-3960X - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €284.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
116
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.37/FPS
100%
Price, €
€42.58
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €42.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3960X | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Nov 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Athlon |
Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
130 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |