Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3930K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900 is 3090 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3930K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 15% better in Ready or Not than Core i7-3930K - 275 vs 240 FPS
- Up to 1% cheaper than Core i7-3930K - $201.79 vs $204.73
- Up to 15% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i7-3930K - $0.81 vs $0.95 per FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-3930K - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3930K - 20 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3930K doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €227.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1143 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
275
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.81/FPS
100%
Price, €
€223.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €223.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1144 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3930K | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
---|---|---|
Nov 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |