Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-10700K outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3930K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-10700K is 3090 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3930K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 17% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-3930K - 182 vs 155 FPS
- Up to 18% cheaper than Core i7-3930K - $168.18 vs $204.73
- Up to 30% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-3930K - $1.03 vs $1.47 per FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i7-3930K - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3930K - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3930K doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €227.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5749 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
182
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.03/FPS
100%
Price, €
€186.68
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €186.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5750 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3930K | vs | Intel Core i7-10700K |
---|---|---|
Nov 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |