Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105 outperforms Core i7-3820QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105 is 3243 days newer than Core i7-3820QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3820QM
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105 - 45 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Performs up to 5% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-3820QM - 159 vs 151 FPS
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
159
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.44/FPS
100%
Price, €
€70.14
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €70.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43990 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
629
42.29993275050437%
Multi-Core
2147
46.58277283575613%
Intel Core i7-3820QM | vs | Intel Core i3-10105 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |