Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 4347 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3820.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3820
- Up to 40% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - $233.89 vs $386.79
- Up to 21% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i9-14900F - $0.69 vs $0.87 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 31% better in Battlefield IV than Core i7-3820 - 495 vs 378 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3820 - 32 vs 8 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
FPS
378
76%
Value, €/FPS
€0.69/FPS
100%
Price, €
€259.62
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €259.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
495
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.87/FPS
79%
Price, €
€429.34
60%
FPS Winner
Buy for €429.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3820 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Feb 13th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
130 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |