Buy on Amazon
€122.56
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 2999 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3820.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3820
- Up to 28% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $110.41 vs $153.55
- Up to 19% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i7-10700F - $0.83 vs $1.03 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 13% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i7-3820 - 166 vs 147 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-3820 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3820 - 16 vs 8 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-3820
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
FPS
147
88.55421686746988%
Value, €/FPS
€0.83/FPS
100%
Price, €
€122.56
100%
Value Winner
CM8061901049606 Core i7 i7-3820 3.60 GHz Processor - Socket LGA-2011
Buy for €122.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 338 minutes ago
Core i7-10700F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
166
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.03/FPS
80.58252427184466%
Price, €
€170.44
71%
FPS Winner
Intel® Core™ i7-10700F Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 4.8 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA1200 (Intel® 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for €170.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 341 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-3820
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Core i7-10700F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3820
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Single-Core
617
38.27543424317618%
Multi-Core
2299
31.79366615959065%
Intel Core i7-3820 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 13th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.