Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3820 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-3820 is 1786 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3820
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i7-3820 - $46.74 vs $233.89
- Up to 80% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i7-3820 - $0.25 vs $1.23 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i7-3820 - 51 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3820 doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €259.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
211
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€51.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €51.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3820 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Feb 13th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
130 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |