Buy on Amazon
€64.52
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $417
Availability
MSRP in USD: $417
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2620 v3 outperforms Core i7-3770S on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2620 v3 is 862 days newer than Core i7-3770S.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770S
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 65 vs 85 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Performs up to 0% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i7-3770S - 213 vs 212 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770S - 12 vs 8 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i7-3770S
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
212
99.53051643192488%
Value, €/FPS
€0.3/FPS
100%
Price, €
€64.52
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i7-3770S Quad-Core Processor 3.1 GHz 8 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80637I73770S
Buy for €64.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60405 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i7-3770S
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3770S
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
669
72.2462203023758%
Multi-Core
2234
55.905905905905904%
Intel Core i7-3770S | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell-E |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 85 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.