Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-14400F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3770S on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-14400F is 4271 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3770S.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770S
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 11% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i7-3770S - 188 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 32% cheaper than Core i7-3770S - $146.23 vs $215.7
- Up to 39% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i7-3770S - $0.86 vs $1.42 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770S - 16 vs 8 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €239.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 93 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
188
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.86/FPS
100%
Price, €
€162.31
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €162.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3770S | vs | Intel Core i5-14400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |