Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3770S outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-3770S is 2165 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770S
- Performs up to 3% better in The Callisto Protocol than Celeron G4900 - 81 vs 79 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 33% cheaper than Core i7-3770S - $39.15 vs $58.13
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770S - 54 vs 65 Watts
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €64.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76789 minutes ago
Buy for €43.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76789 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
92.07772795216741%
Multi-Core
1051
47.04565801253357%
Intel Core i7-3770S | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |