Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Core i7-3770S vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

Core i7-3770S vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

Intel Core i7-3770S

3.1 GHz | 4-core

Intel Core i7-3770S Logo
Intel Core i7-3770S Quad-Core Processor 3.1 GHz 8 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80637I73770S

Buy for 64.52 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 76677 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

2.7 GHz | 64-core

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX Logo
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 64-core, 128-thread desktop processor

Buy for 1,216.62 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 76679 minutes ago

Intel Core i7-3770S

3.1 GHz | 4-core

Intel Core i7-3770S Logo
Intel Core i7-3770S Quad-Core Processor 3.1 GHz 8 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80637I73770S

Buy for 64.52 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 76677 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

2.7 GHz | 64-core

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX Logo
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 64-core, 128-thread desktop processor

Buy for 1,216.62 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 76679 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770S on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is 2998 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770S.

Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770S

  • Up to 95% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX - $58.13 vs $1096.05
  • Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX - 65 vs 280 Watts
  • Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX doesn't have integrated graphics

Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

  • Performs up to 21% better in Dota 2 than Core i7-3770S - 212 vs 175 FPS
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770S - 128 vs 8 threads
This is a free version of Dota 2.
Dota 2

Dota 2

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Best Looking

Intel Core i7-3770S Logo
Core i7-3770S

Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012


FPS

175

82.54716981132076%

Value, €/FPS

Price, €

€64.52

100%

Intel Core i7-3770S Quad-Core Processor 3.1 GHz 8 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80637I73770S

Buy for 64.52 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 76677 minutes ago

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX Logo
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020


FPS

212

100%

Value, €/FPS

Price, €

€1216.62

5%

FPS Winner

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 64-core, 128-thread desktop processor

Buy for 1,216.62 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 76679 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Best Looking

Intel Core i7-3770S Logo
Core i7-3770S

Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX Logo
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Core i7-3770S Logo
Core i7-3770S

Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012


Single-Core

669

41.8648310387985%

Multi-Core

2234

15.066091178850824%

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX Logo
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020


Single-Core

1598

100%

Multi-Core

14828

100%

Intel Core i7-3770S Logo

Intel Core i7-3770S

vs
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX Logo

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

Apr 29th, 2012Release Date
Jul 14th, 2020
Core i7CollectionRyzen Threadripper
Ivy BridgeCodenameCastle Peak
Intel Socket 1155SocketAMD Socket WRX8
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
4Cores
64
8Threads
128
3.1 GHz
Base Clock Speed2.7 GHz
3.9 GHzTurbo Clock Speed
4.2 GHz
65 W
TDP280 W
22 nmProcess Size
7 nm
31.0x
Multiplier27.0x
Intel HD 4000
Integrated GraphicsNone
NoOverclockableNo

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.