Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3770S on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 3112 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3770S.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770S
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5900X - 65 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 21% better in No Man's Sky than Core i7-3770S - 193 vs 160 FPS
- Up to 11% cheaper than Core i7-3770S - $191.57 vs $215.7
- Up to 27% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i7-3770S - $1.1 vs $1.5 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770S - 24 vs 8 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €239.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3631 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
193
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€212.64
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €212.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3631 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3770S | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 5900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |