Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3770S outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-3770S is 120 days older than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770S
- Performs up to 2% better in The Last of Us Part I than FX-4130 - 129 vs 127 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 92% cheaper than Core i7-3770S - $16.76 vs $215.7
- Up to 92% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-3770S - $0.15 vs $1.86 per FPS
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €239.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 143 minutes ago
Buy for €18.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 143 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3770S | vs | AMD FX-4130 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |