Buy on Amazon
€142.04
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $313
Availability
MSRP in USD: $313
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 2923 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Up to 23% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $127.96 vs $165.23
- Up to 19% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i7-10700F - $0.97 vs $1.2 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 5% better in Dead Space than Core i7-3770K - 153 vs 146 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770K - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770K - 16 vs 8 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-3770K
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
146
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.97/FPS
100%
Price, €
€142.04
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i7-3770K Quad-Core Processor 3.5 GHz 8 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80637I73770K
Buy for €142.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14006 minutes ago
Core i7-10700F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
153
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.2/FPS
80%
Price, €
€183.41
77%
FPS Winner
Intel® Core™ i7-10700F Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 4.8 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA1200 (Intel® 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for €183.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14006 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-3770K
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Core i7-10700F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3770K | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
| 77 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.