Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-9400F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3770K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-9400F is 2445 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3770K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 9% better in Ready or Not than Core i7-3770K - 266 vs 243 FPS
- Up to 44% cheaper than Core i7-3770K - $71.53 vs $127.96
- Up to 48% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i7-3770K - $0.3 vs $0.58 per FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770K - 65 vs 77 Watts
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €142.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 125 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
266
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.3/FPS
100%
Price, €
€79.4
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €79.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 127 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3770K | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |