Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 1929 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Up to 48% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $94.74 vs $182.8
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 77 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 11% better in Dota 2 than Core i7-3770K - 195 vs 176 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770K - 24 vs 8 threads
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Buy for €105.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78416 minutes ago
Buy for €202.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78418 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
707
60.221465076660984%
Multi-Core
2469
35.392775229357795%
Intel Core i7-3770K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |