Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3770K outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-3770K is 365 days older than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Performs up to 6% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than FX-6350 - 474 vs 448 FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 77 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 43% cheaper than Core i7-3770K - $73.12 vs $127.96
- Up to 40% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-3770K - $0.18 vs $0.3 per FPS
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €142.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 225 minutes ago
Buy for €81.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 225 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3770K | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |