Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Xeon E5-1620 v4 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is 1513 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Up to 11% cheaper than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $89.23 vs $99.89
- Consumes up to 45% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 77 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Performs up to 16% better in War Thunder than Core i7-3770 - 162 vs 140 FPS
- Up to 4% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i7-3770 - $0.68 vs $0.71 per FPS
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Buy for €99.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18135 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
162
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.68/FPS
100%
Price, €
€110.88
89%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €110.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18137 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3770 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |