Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 2923 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - $89.23 vs $321.73
- Up to 68% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Core i9-10900K - $0.78 vs $2.4 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 77 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 17% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Core i7-3770 - 149 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770 - 20 vs 8 threads
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
127
85%
Value, €/FPS
€0.78/FPS
100%
Price, €
€99.05
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €99.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13077 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
149
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.4/FPS
32%
Price, €
€357.12
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for €357.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13078 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3770 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |