Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700F is 3902 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i7-13700F - $89.23 vs $1023.66
- Up to 89% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i7-13700F - $0.26 vs $2.39 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-13700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 25% better in Battlefield IV than Core i7-3770 - 476 vs 380 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770 - 24 vs 8 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
380
79%
Value, €/FPS
€0.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€99.05
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €99.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12983 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
476
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.39/FPS
10%
Price, €
€1136.26
8%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,136.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12982 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3770 | vs | Intel Core i7-13700F |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
77 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |