Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700K is 2923 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i7-10700K - $69.47 vs $180.79
- Up to 55% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-10700K - $0.49 vs $1.1 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700K - 77 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 17% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-3770 - 182 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770 - 16 vs 8 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
156
85%
Value, €/FPS
€0.49/FPS
100%
Price, €
€77.11
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €77.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 83 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
182
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.1/FPS
44%
Price, €
€200.68
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for €200.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 83 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3770 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700K |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |