Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 3902 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Up to 92% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $61.76 vs $730.45
- Up to 90% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i5-13400F - $0.57 vs $5.55 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 22% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i7-3770 - 146 vs 120 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770 - 16 vs 8 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
120
82%
Value, €/FPS
€0.57/FPS
100%
Price, €
€68.55
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €68.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55 minutes ago
Buy for €810.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3770 | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
77 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |