Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3770 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 3537 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3770.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 12% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i7-3770 - 135 vs 120 FPS
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i7-3770 - $36.56 vs $69.47
- Up to 53% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i7-3770 - $0.3 vs $0.64 per FPS
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €77.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 121 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
135
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.3/FPS
100%
Price, €
€40.58
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €40.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 121 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3770 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
77 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |