Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3770 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G550 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G550 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-3770 is 33 days older than the cheaper Celeron G550.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Performs up to 1% better in Dead Space than Celeron G550 - 146 vs 144 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G550 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G550
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i7-3770 - $35.83 vs $89.23
- Up to 59% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i7-3770 - $0.28 vs $0.68 per FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770 - 65 vs 77 Watts
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €99.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14605 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
144
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.28/FPS
100%
Price, €
€39.77
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €39.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14605 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3770 | vs | Intel Celeron G550 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
77 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |