Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms Core i7-3687U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 1911 days newer than Core i7-3687U.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3687U
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 17 vs 54 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 3% better in Dota 2 than Core i7-3687U - 173 vs 168 FPS
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
173
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€43.46
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €43.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2358 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3687U | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
17 W | TDP | 54 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |