Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms Core i7-3687U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 2512 days newer than Core i7-3687U.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3687U
- Consumes up to 94% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 17 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 98% better in Diablo IV than Core i7-3687U - 196 vs 99 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3687U - 48 vs 4 threads
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
196
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.97/FPS
100%
Price, €
€973.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €973.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 116 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2013
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3687U | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 48 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 280 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |