Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11800H outperforms Core i7-3635QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-11800H is 3174 days newer than Core i7-3635QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11800H
- Performs up to 13% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i7-3635QM - 175 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3635QM - 16 vs 8 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Core i7-3635QM
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2012
Core i7-11800H
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3635QM | vs | Intel Core i7-11800H |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2012 | Release Date | May 11th, 2021 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Tiger Lake |
| Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | Intel BGA 1787 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
| 45 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
