Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2650 v3 outperforms Core i7-3630QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2650 v3 is 708 days newer than Core i7-3630QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3630QM
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 45 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Performs up to 800% better in Cities: Skylines II than Core i7-3630QM - 9 vs 1 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3630QM - 20 vs 8 threads
Cities: Skylines II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i7-3630QM
Mobile • Sep 30th, 2012
Xeon E5-2650 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3630QM
Mobile • Sep 30th, 2012
Single-Core
556
62.75395033860045%
Multi-Core
1867
34.715507623651916%
Intel Core i7-3630QM | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 30th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 10 |
| 8 | Threads | 20 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
