Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Core i7-3615QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 3558 days newer than Core i7-3615QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3615QM
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i3-12100F - 45 vs 58 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 23% better in No Man's Sky than Core i7-3615QM - 194 vs 158 FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
194
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.32/FPS
100%
Price, €
€62.33
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €62.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 213 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3615QM | vs | Intel Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 58 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |