Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms Core i7-3540M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 1911 days newer than Core i7-3540M.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3540M
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 35 vs 54 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 1% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i7-3540M - 156 vs 155 FPS
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
156
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.35/FPS
100%
Price, €
€55.21
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €55.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 150 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3540M | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 54 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |