Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms Core i7-2920XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 3107 days newer than Core i7-2920XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2920XM
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 73% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-2920XM - 391 vs 226 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2920XM - 12 vs 8 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €72.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66734 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2011
Single-Core
384
24.04508453350031%
Multi-Core
1269
18.434049970947125%
Intel Core i7-2920XM | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |