Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms Core i7-2860QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 3161 days newer than Core i7-2860QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2860QM
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 45 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 5% better in Dead Space than Core i7-2860QM - 152 vs 145 FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
152
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.64/FPS
100%
Price, €
€97.4
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €97.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 36 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2860QM | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |