Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2700K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-2700K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400 is 3111 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2700K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2700K
- Up to 28% cheaper than Core i5-10400 - $65.07 vs $90.37
- Up to 14% better value when playing Rust than Core i5-10400 - $0.44 vs $0.51 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 20% better in Rust than Core i7-2700K - 196 vs 163 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-2700K - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2700K - 12 vs 8 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
FPS
163
83%
Value, €/FPS
€0.44/FPS
100%
Price, €
€72.23
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €72.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12982 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
196
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.51/FPS
86%
Price, €
€100.31
72%
FPS Winner
Buy for €100.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12989 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2700K | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
---|---|---|
Oct 24th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |