Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-2700K outperforms the more expensive FX-8320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-2700K is 365 days older than the more expensive FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2700K
- Performs up to 11% better in Counter-Strike 2 than FX-8320 - 263 vs 236 FPS
- Up to 13% cheaper than FX-8320 - $65.07 vs $74.59
- Up to 23% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than FX-8320 - $0.27 vs $0.35 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
FPS
263
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€72.23
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €72.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 240 minutes ago
Buy for €82.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 240 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2700K | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
Oct 24th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |