Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms Core i7-2675QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 4003 days newer than Core i7-2675QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2675QM
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 45 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 5% better in Control than Core i7-2675QM - 208 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2675QM - 32 vs 8 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
208
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.84/FPS
100%
Price, €
€382.61
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €382.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60800 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Mobile • Oct 12th, 2011
Single-Core
449
15.102589976454759%
Multi-Core
1385
6.890204467439432%
Intel Core i7-2675QM | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |