Buy on Amazon
€43.46
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $42
Availability
MSRP in USD: $42
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms Core i7-2675QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 2365 days newer than Core i7-2675QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2675QM
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 45 vs 54 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 2% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Core i7-2675QM - 228 vs 223 FPS
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
228
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€43.46
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Celeron G4900 3.1 GHz Used Dual-Core Dual-Thread 54W CPU Processor LGA 1151
Buy for €43.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44029 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i7-2675QM
Mobile • Oct 12th, 2011
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2675QM | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 22.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.