Buy on Amazon
€177.74
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms Core i7-2635QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 3405 days newer than Core i7-2635QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2635QM
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700F - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 32% better in Rust than Core i7-2635QM - 204 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2635QM - 16 vs 8 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i7-10700F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
204
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.87/FPS
100%
Price, €
€177.74
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel® Core™ i7-10700F Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 4.8 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA1200 (Intel® 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for €177.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 35 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i7-2635QM
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2011
Core i7-10700F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2635QM | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.