Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms Core i7-2630QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is 3248 days newer than Core i7-2630QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2630QM
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 45 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Performs up to 17% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-2630QM - 134 vs 115 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2630QM - 64 vs 8 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
134
100%
Value, €/FPS
€10.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1359.47
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,359.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 218 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2630QM | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 32 |
8 | Threads | 64 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 280 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |