Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-13700F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2600S on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-13700F is 4378 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2600S.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600S
- Up to 20% cheaper than Core i7-13700F - $171.83 vs $213.88
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-13700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 33% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-2600S - 156 vs 117 FPS
- Up to 7% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-2600S - $1.52 vs $1.63 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2600S - 24 vs 8 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
117
75%
Value, €/FPS
€1.63/FPS
93.25153374233129%
Price, €
€190.73
100%
Buy for €190.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 118 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
156
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.52/FPS
100%
Price, €
€237.41
80%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €237.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 118 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
583
21.909056745584365%
Multi-Core
1811
11.702746365105009%
Intel Core i7-2600S | vs | Intel Core i7-13700F |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |